| Click for the Finfacts Ireland Portal Homepage |

Finfacts Business News Centre

News Main Page 
 
 News
 Irish
 European
 International
 Asia-Pacific Business Week
 
 Analysis/Comment

RSS FEED


How to use our RSS feed

 
Web Finfacts

Welcome

Finfacts is Ireland's leading business information site and you are in its business news section.

We provide access to live business television and business related videos from: Bloomberg TV; The Wall Street Journal; CNBC and the Financial Times. Click image:

Links

Finfacts Homepage

Global News

Bloomberg News

CNN Money

Cnet Tech News

Newspapers

Irish Independent

Irish Times

Irish Examiner

New York Times

Financial Times

Technology News

 

Feedback

 

Search

Analysis/Comment Last Updated: Dec 19th, 2007 - 13:17:15


Pat McArdle, Ulster Bank: National Development Plan lacks numerical transparency and gives the impression that spending is greater than it actually is
By Pat McArdle, Chief Economist Ulster Bank
Jan 24, 2007, 22:53

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

Pat McArdle
Joined-up Government thinking is good, indeed, we usually bemoan its absence. However, yesterday we got more than we bargained for. Instead of just concentrating on the key Central Government area as usual, the National Development Plan (NDP) includes capital spending by commercial State Bodies and much current spending as well. The result is a mind boggling headline figure but the reality is different.

The positive from this is that it gives a good broad overview of all the investment activities. The negative is that it lacks numerical transparency and gives the impression that spending is greater than it actually is.

Appendix 2 at the back of the 300-page document gives a breakdown of the core NDP, that is, the Central Government Multi-Annual Capital Investment Framework. This comes to €78.1 billion and is the usual measure of investment spend – it is obviously a long way away from the headline €184 billion figure. It is some €14 billion above the recommended ESRI figure. The extra spend goes on transport (€4bn), housing (€1.7bn), environment (€1.4bn), health & education (€1.1 bn) and an unallocated reserve of €5bn. The gap between them is not as big as commonly supposed.

The difference of opinion with the ESRI gave rise to the impression that the NDP spend has been ramped up. This is largely, if not totally, illusionary. We can compare the Exchequer capital spend in the NDP with that in the recent Budget for the three years 2007 to 2009, inclusive. The extra spend over the three year period is only €0.3bn or 3.2%. In reality, the capital spend in the NDP is unchanged from the December Budget which was regarded as being more responsible than many of its predecessors. By the same token, there is no reason to suppose that current spending has changed either, though we are not given details which would enable us to verify this.

The size of the capital spend is usually measured by expressing it as a percentage of GNP. The long-term target is 5% but this has been missed in recent years. In 2006, the outcome was 4.5%. This is now forecast to increase to 4.9% this year, 5.3% next and to peak at 5.9% in 2009. It will then fall back as it is expected to average 5.4% over the period of the Plan. There is no major economic impetus here over and above what was in the Budget although most people did not realise this as the Budget was deliberately vague on capital matters, no doubt to save the thunder for yesterday.

Fears that the taxpayer will have to pick up an extra bill are misplaced. First, it is unlikely that all of the capital will be spent. Second, the economic forecasts are conservative with growth at just over 4% and inflation a lowly 2%. Third, if the economy does slow, there is scope to lower the Budget surplus or run a modest deficit – even the EU have accepted that this would be valid.

Inflation should be no different from the Budget projections – 4.1%, 2.4% and 2% in 07, 08 & 09, respectively, – as the NDP does not change the Budget figs.

RELATED

Government launches €184 billion National Development Plan - Main Points and Analysis


© Copyright 2007 by Finfacts.com

Top of Page

Analysis/Comment
Latest Headlines
Dr. Peter Morici: The Federal Reserve needs more than a new Communications Strategy
The Irish Mind and the Knowledge Economy: Should we bank everything on fuzzy leprechaunic political dreams?
Dr. Peter Morici: Why the US Trade Deficit matters?
Dr. Peter Morici: US Recession Watch, the Jobs Report and Fed Policy
Dr. Peter Morici: Business as Usual: the Energy Bill, Subprime Mess, and Recession Watch
Dr. Peter Morici: China’s Dragon does not flinch and Bernanke’s Toothless Dog
Cabinet decision to defer Irish ministerial pay hikes until 2009 seen as empty gesture after weeks of controversy
Dr. Peter Morici: President Bush's Mortgage Program and Rumblings from Europe about the Dollar
Dr. Peter Morici: Avoiding a US Recession
Christmas Fear and a proposed German Minimum Wage - Prof Hans-Werner Sinn
Nine months after ISEQ record highs, Irish shares likely to underperform other markets for sometime
Dr. Peter Morici: An Emergency Interest Rate Cut? and The Week Ahead: Forecasts for the Weeks of November 26 and December 3 (preliminary)
Germany: How the Upswing Came About - Six Hypotheses - - Prof. Hans-Werner Sinn
Dr. Peter Morici: The Limits of US Federal Reserve Policy
Dr. Peter Morici: US Stock Prices and the Trade Deficit; Forecasts for the Weeks of November 12 and November 19
Dr. Peter Morici: US Economy adds 166,000 employees in October; While ranks of the Self Employed fall: Credit Crisis grows, Bernanke’s credibility suffers
Dr. Peter Morici: The Fed's Misstep, and Forecasts for the Weeks of November 5 and November 1
Dr. Peter Morici: The Falling US Dollar and the Stubborn US Trade Deficit
Where is the Outrage? Gombeenism thrives at home while in Paris, OECD staff work on proposals for Irish public service reform
Dr. Peter Morici: Why Bernanke should Cut Rates and Forecasts for the Weeks of October 22 and October 29