|
Last Updated: Dec 19th, 2007 - 13:17:15 |
Update
June 2005 - OECD in Figures 2005 : The 2005 edition of OECD in
Figures contains key data on OECD countries, ranging from economic growth
and employment to trade and migration. There are comparable
tables on the environment, science and public finances. For added
perspective, OECD in Figures includes a selection of graphs,
giving snapshots on subjects such as GDP, education spending, services trade,
health funding, development aid and renewable energy.
 |
| More than 100 indicators cover a wide range of areas: economy, agriculture, education, energy, environment, foreign aid, health and quality of life, industry, information and communications, population/labour force, trade and investment, taxation, public expenditure and R&D... |
Norway and Sweden
have the highest female employment rates of all OECD countries although the
percentage of working-age women in jobs has been growing fastest in Ireland,
Spain and the Netherlands, according to the OECD’s new Factbook released on
Tuesday.
Labour market data, broken down by
age, gender, part-time working or self-employment provide just some of the 100
major indicators to be found in this annual digest of economic, environmental
and social statistics covering the organisation’s 30 member nations. The data -
available in book form and online – is accompanied by explanatory analysis and
easy-to-read charts to enable clear cross-country comparisons of long-term
trends in the following areas:
- Population and migration
- Macroeconomic trends
- Economic globalisation
- Prices
- Labour market
- Science and technology
- Energy
- Environment
- Education
- Public policies
- Quality of life
Most of the indicators present the
latest available, internationally-comparable figures together with historical
data going back at least 10 years. The Factbook also provides some projections
of future trends in areas such as population ageing, economics and the
environment.
The online
version, freely available at http://new.SourceOECD.org/factbook, enables the downloading of the
data underlying the tables and graphs.
Some sample
data...
Evolution of the
population
The size and growth of a country’s
population are both causes and effects of economic and social developments. The
natural increase in population (births minus deaths) has slowed in all OECD
countries, resulting in a rise in the average age of populations. In several
countries, falling rates of natural increase have been partly offset by
immigration.
Definition
The tables refer to the resident
population. Growth rates are the annual changes in the population and are the
net result of births, deaths and net immigration during the year. Birth rates
are calculated as the number of live births per 1 000 population.
Comparability
For most OECD countries, population
data are based on regular, ten-yearly censuses, with estimates for intercensal
years being derived from administrative data such as population registers,
notified births and deaths and migration records. In some European countries,
including Germany and the
Netherlands, population censuses are no longer
carried out and the estimates are based entirely on administrative records. In
general, the population data for OECD countries are reliable, although, for some
countries, there are breaks in the series as indicated by vertical lines in the
tables.
There is a particularly important
break in the series for the United
States between 2000 and 2001.
Long-term trends
In 2000, OECD countries accounted for just
over 18% of the world’s population of 6 billion. China accounted for 21% and
India for just over 17%. The next two
largest countries were Indonesia (3%) and the
Russian
Federation (2%). Within OECD, the
United
States accounted for nearly 25% of the
OECD total, followed by Japan (11%),
Mexico (9%),
Germany (7%) and
Turkey (6%).
Between 1990 and 2003, population
growth rates for all OECD countries averaged 0.6% per annum. Growth rates much
higher than this were recorded for Mexico and
Turkey (high birth rate countries) and for
Australia,
Canada,
Luxembourg and
New
Zealand (high net immigration). In the
Czech Republic and
Hungary populations declined from a
combination of low birth rates and net emigration. Growth rates were very low,
although still positive, in Italy,
Poland, and the
Slovak Republic.
From 1990 to 2000 average birth
rates for all OECD countries fell from 14.3 per 1 000 population to 12.4. All
OECD countries except Denmark and
Luxembourg experienced falling birth rates
over the period. Falls were small – less than 0.5 per 1 000 – in France, Greece,
Japan, Netherlands, Portugal and Spain, but were very marked – 3.5 per 1 000
population or more – in Canada, Czech Republic, Iceland, Poland, Slovak Republic
and Sweden. By the end of the period Iceland,
Mexico, and
Turkey had the highest birth-rates while
the Czech Republic,
Germany and
Italy had the lowest.
Foreign
population
The size of a country’s immigrant population
is important for several reasons. Immigrants bring new ideas and enrich the
cultures of their host nation, they may accept jobs that are no longer
attractive to native workers, and in countries with low birth-rates immigrant
workers can offset declining work forces and help to fund retirement pensions.
At the same time, immigration on a large scale presents political and social
challenges to government.
Figure: Immigrant population in
selected OECD countries
Definition
To measure the size of the immigrant
population, OECD countries use two main approaches. Some countries record the
number of residents who were born in a foreign country; others record the number
of residents who have a foreign nationality.
Comparability
These two approaches give different
results depending, in particular, on the rules governing the acquisition of
citizenship in each country. For example, in some countries children born in the
country automatically acquire the citizenship of their country of birth
(countries of jus solis, the right of soil) while in other countries they retain
the nationality of their parents (countries of jus sanguinis, the right of
blood). Both measures are shown in the table for
Denmark,
Finland, the
Netherlands and
Sweden. It can be seen that for these
countries the foreign-born criterion gives substantially higher percentages for
the immigrant population than the approach based on nationality.
Long-term trends
It is difficult to have a clear idea of the
trend in the immigrant population from the statistics on the foreign population.
This is because new additions to the foreign population due to immigration can
be offset by the acquisition of nationality on the part of resident foreigners.
The data on the foreign-born, however, are unambiguous: the percentage of the
foreign born has increased over the past decade in all countries for which
data are available.
The countries with the largest share
of the foreign population are Luxembourg and
Switzerland. On the other hand,
Australia,
Canada and
New
Zealand have the highest proportion of
foreign-born. Switzerland is certainly among those with high
foreign-born populations, although no firm data on the foreign-born are as yet
available.
|
|
Population and migration -
international migration - foreign population
|
|
|
OECD FACTBOOK 2005 – ISBN
92-64-01869-7 – © OECD 2005 |
|
|
|
|
Immigrant population in OECD
countries |
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total
population |
|
|
1990 |
1991 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
|
Foreign-born |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
22.8 |
22.9 |
23.0 |
23.1 |
23.2 |
|
Canada |
.. |
16.1 |
.. |
18.2 |
.. |
|
Denmark |
3.7 |
3.9 |
5.8 |
6.0 |
6.2 |
|
Finland |
.. |
.. |
2.6 |
2.8 |
2.9 |
|
Netherlands |
8.1 |
.. |
10.1 |
10.4 |
10.6 |
|
New
Zealand |
.. |
.. |
.. |
19.5 |
.. |
|
Sweden |
.. |
.. |
11.3 |
11.5 |
11.8 |
|
United
States |
.. |
.. |
10.8 |
11.1 |
11.8 |
|
Foreign
nationals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Austria |
5.9 |
6.8 |
8.8 |
8.8 |
8.8 |
|
Belgium |
9.1 |
9.2 |
8.4 |
8.2 |
8.2 |
|
Czech
Republic |
.. |
.. |
1.9 |
2.0 |
2.3 |
|
Denmark |
3.1 |
3.3 |
4.8 |
5.0 |
4.9 |
|
Finland |
0.5 |
0.8 |
1.8 |
1.9 |
2.0 |
|
France |
6.3 |
.. |
.. |
.. |
.. |
|
Germany |
8.4 |
7.3 |
8.9 |
8.9 |
8.9 |
|
Greece |
.. |
.. |
.. |
7.0 |
.. |
|
Hungary |
.. |
.. |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
|
Ireland |
2.3 |
2.5 |
3.3 |
4.0 |
4.8 |
|
Italy |
1.4 |
1.5 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
2.6 |
|
Japan |
0.9 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
|
Korea |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
|
Luxembourg |
29.4 |
30.2 |
37.3 |
37.5 |
38.1 |
|
Mexico |
.. |
.. |
0.4 |
.. |
.. |
|
Netherlands |
4.6 |
4.8 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
|
Norway |
3.4 |
3.5 |
4.1 |
4.1 |
4.3 |
|
Poland |
.. |
.. |
.. |
.. |
0.1 |
|
Portugal |
1.1 |
1.2 |
2.1 |
3.4 |
4.0 |
|
Slovak
Republic |
.. |
.. |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
|
Spain |
0.7 |
0.9 |
2.2 |
2.7 |
3.1 |
|
Sweden |
5.6 |
5.7 |
5.4 |
5.3 |
5.3 |
|
Switzerland |
16.3 |
17.1 |
19.3 |
19.7 |
19.9 |
|
United
Kingdom |
3.2 |
3.1 |
4.0 |
4.4 |
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment rates by age
group
These rates show the percentage of persons
of working age who are in employment, broken down into three age groups. The
youngest age group contains persons who are just entering the labour market, the
second group those in their prime working lives, and the third group those who
are approaching retirement.
Employment rates in these different
age groups are significantly affected by government policies with regard to
higher education, pensions and retirement age.
Definition
To calculate the employment rate for
a given age group, the total population in that age group is divided between
those in employment and those who are not. The numbers in employment are then
expressed as a percentage of the total numbers in that age
group.
Employment is generally measured
through household labour force surveys and, according to the ILO Guidelines,
employed persons are defined as those aged 15 or over who report that they have
worked in gainful employment for at least one hour in the previous week. Those
not in employment consist of persons who are out of work but seeking employment,
students and all others who have excluded themselves from the labour force for
one reason or another, such as incapacity or the need to look after young
children or elderly relatives.
Comparability
All OECD countries except
Iceland,
Mexico and
Turkey use the ILO Guidelines for
measuring employment. For the three countries that do not do so, employment
rates are consistent over time but are not strictly comparable with the ratios
for the other countries.
For the denominators – the
population in each age group – the sources are a mixture of labour force
surveys, administrative records and population censuses.
Long-term
trends
In general, employment rates for
those in the prime age group – 25 to 54 – are very similar between countries
with ratios for most countries over 70% in 2003. Rates are most variable between
countries for those in the youngest age group where, in 2003, they ranged from
under 30% in Poland,
Italy,
Greece,
Hungary,
Belgium and the
Slovak Republic to over 60% in
Switzerland and the
Netherlands. Employment rates for the oldest
age group also vary considerably between countries with nearly 70% of this age
group in employment in 2003 in Norway and Sweden but less than 30% employed in
the Slovak Republic, Belgium, Poland and Hungary.
Over the period shown in the tables,
employment rates for the youngest age group have been falling for the OECD as a
whole. This partly reflects government policies to encourage young people to
enter tertiary education, but the falls have been most marked countries where
total employment rates have been falling, such as the Czech Republic, Poland and
Turkey; when the labour market is tight, young people have particular
difficulties in finding employment. For those in the prime working age group –
25 to 54 – employment rates have remained stable for the OECD as a whole, but
there were significant falls in the employment rates for
Poland,
Sweden and
Turkey and large gains in
Ireland, the
Netherlands and
Spain. Persons in the top age group have
fared particularly well overall, with the largest increases in employment rates
for Belgium, the
Czech
Republic,
Netherlands and
New
Zealand.
|
Labour
market - employment - employment rates by age group |
|
OECD
FACTBOOK 2005 – ISBN 92-64-01869-7 – © OECD 2005 |
|
|
|
Employment rates for age group
55-64 |
|
|
|
|
Persons in employment as a
percentage of population in that age group |
|
|
|
1990 |
1991 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
|
Australia |
41.8 |
39.3 |
46.3 |
48.2 |
50.1 |
|
Austria |
.. |
.. |
28.2 |
27.6 |
30.1 |
|
Belgium |
21.4 |
21.6 |
25.2 |
25.8 |
28.1 |
|
Canada |
46.3 |
44.5 |
48.3 |
50.4 |
53.0 |
|
Czech
Republic |
.. |
.. |
37.1 |
40.8 |
42.3 |
|
Denmark |
53.6 |
51.7 |
56.5 |
57.3 |
60.7 |
|
Finland |
42.8 |
40.6 |
45.9 |
47.8 |
49.9 |
|
France |
35.6 |
34.8 |
36.5 |
39.3 |
36.8 |
|
Germany |
36.8 |
35.9 |
37.9 |
38.6 |
39.0 |
|
Greece |
40.8 |
39.0 |
38.0 |
39.2 |
41.9 |
|
Hungary |
.. |
.. |
23.5 |
25.6 |
29.0 |
|
Iceland |
.. |
85.4 |
85.6 |
87.2 |
.. |
|
Ireland |
38.6 |
38.9 |
46.6 |
48.0 |
49.3 |
|
Italy |
32.6 |
32.1 |
28.0 |
28.9 |
30.3 |
|
Japan |
62.9 |
64.4 |
62.0 |
61.6 |
62.1 |
|
Korea |
61.9 |
61.2 |
58.3 |
59.5 |
57.8 |
|
Luxembourg |
28.2 |
23.2 |
24.8 |
27.9 |
.. |
|
Mexico |
.. |
54.1 |
52.1 |
53.1 |
53.8 |
|
Netherlands |
29.7 |
28.0 |
38.8 |
41.8 |
43.5 |
|
New
Zealand |
41.8 |
41.6 |
60.7 |
63.4 |
64.4 |
|
Norway |
61.5 |
61.2 |
67.4 |
68.4 |
68.8 |
|
Poland |
.. |
.. |
29.0 |
27.9 |
28.6 |
|
Portugal |
47.0 |
49.3 |
50.0 |
50.9 |
51.1 |
|
Slovak
Republic |
.. |
.. |
22.3 |
22.9 |
24.6 |
|
Spain |
36.9 |
36.4 |
39.2 |
39.7 |
40.8 |
|
Sweden |
69.4 |
69.3 |
67.0 |
68.3 |
69.0 |
|
Switzerland |
.. |
63.1 |
67.1 |
64.8 |
65.6 |
|
Turkey |
42.7 |
43.4 |
35.9 |
35.3 |
32.7 |
|
United
Kingdom |
49.2 |
49.0 |
52.2 |
53.3 |
55.5 |
|
United
States |
54.0 |
53.2 |
58.6 |
59.5 |
59.9 |
|
EU15 |
38.5 |
37.8 |
39.3 |
40.6 |
41.5 |
|
OECD total |
48.0 |
47.8 |
48.5 |
49.4 |
50.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|