|
Printer-friendly page from Finfacts Ireland Business News - Click for the News Main Page - A service of the Finfacts Ireland Business and Finance Portal
|
|
|
Tuesday Newspaper Review - Irish Business News and International Stories
By Finfacts Team
Nov 15, 2005, 08:53
The Irish Independent reports that the odds on a pre-Christmas rise in interest rates grew yesterday when the head of the powerful Bank of France joined those saying central bankers could not afford to wait for inflation to emerge.
Financial markets increased their bets on the first rate rise in five years coming at the December 1 meeting of the European Central Bank governing council.
Barclays Capital and Commerzbank joined other leading international banks such as UBS, Deutsche Bank and Bank of America in forecasting a quarter point rate rise next month.
"The momentum of ECB opinion swinging in favour of higher interest rates now looks unstoppable, and so, reluctantly, we now look for the ECB to raise rates on December 1 by 25 basis points," Barclays European economist Julian Callow said in a note to clients.
That momentum increased when Christian Noyer, president of the Bank of France, said it is "always better to prevent rather than cure" when asked whether the ECB could raise rates as early as December.
"It is easier to act to prevent inflationary behaviour than to intervene once this has developed," Mr Noyer told French business daily Les Echos. Many analysts believe the stress on prevention marks out members of the council who are prepared to raise rates.
Klaus Liebscher of the Bank of Austria is one of them, saying: "I belong to the camp of those who think prevention is better than the cure afterwards. I don't believe it is good to wait until certain things materialise."
Perhaps even more significant was Mr Noyer's comment that the market has already factored in a relatively high probability of action next month. Unless ECB officials soften their rhetoric in the next few days, they will be accused of misleading the market if rates do not rise.
FUTURES
Eurozone interest rate futures have priced in an 80pc likelihood of a December rate increase. Short-term markets are less sure but are still assigning a more than 50pc probability.
With Bundesbank president Axel Weber warning yesterday that inflation is "way above our comfort levels," the two biggest central banks seem ready to approve a rates rise. Although no details are given of meetings, it will be assumed that the Governor of the Irish Central Bank, John Hurley, would not be averse to an early rates rise to cool the property market.
Commerzbank economist Michael Schubert has brought forward his forecast by a full 12 months, from December 2006.
The Irish Independent also reports that hopes of a deal to liberalise transatlantic air traffic this week are fading, just days after a new agreement was agreed on phasing out the Shannon stopover.
It's not expected that the final agreement on a new 'open skies' deal between Europe and the US will be finalised before next spring, at the earliest.
Opposition has been growing in Britain, with British Airways warning that recent American offers to relax foreign airline ownership rules don't go far enough.
The likelihood of an imminent deal in Washington spurred the Irish government to try and first finalise a special transition understanding to phase out the Shannon stopover by 2008.
At the moment, one in two of all transatlantic flights from Ireland must go through Shannon.
In Brussels, European Commission officials have stressed this side deal forms part of an overall package.
Commission observers in Washington attended the meetings between the Transport Minister Martin Cullen and US officials last week, they added.
After ten years of complex talks, the looming delay will frustrate many European airlines which hope to consolidate their US links.
Mr Cullen claims that the benefits to Aer Lingus and the tourism industry outweigh the impact on Shannon Airport. Although a delay of a few months would make little long-term difference, it will fuel fears that the recent momentum will be lost and the talks will be frozen again.
The Irish Times reports that social partnership was placed under increasing strain last night with the rejection by Irish Ferries of a Labour Court call for it to shelve its controversial outsourcing plan.
In a recommendation issued yesterday, the court said the company should not proceed with its plan to lay off up to 543 seafarers and replace them with cheaper labour from abroad.
It told the company to honour a three-year agreement on seafarers' pay and conditions, reached with unions in June last year.
The recommendation was rejected within hours by the company, which described it as being "incapable of acceptance and implementation".
It repeated its assertion that it had no choice but to implement the redundancy and outsourcing programme in order to ensure it remained competitive.
The company's stance increases the difficulties faced by the Government in its attempts to secure a new partnership deal.
Unions have decided not to enter talks on a successor to Sustaining Progress in the absence of specific commitments from the Government on measures to prevent exploitation of workers.
The talks had been due to begin tomorrow but have now been postponed indefinitely.
The unions' stance arose directly as a result of the Irish Ferries controversy.
Unless the Government moves to prevent the company from proceeding with its plan, which involves hiring agency seafarers on hourly pay of €3.60, it is unlikely that unions will enter talks.
The outsourcing plan has been condemned by Taoiseach Bertie Ahern, who has said it remains to be seen whether the company "gets away with" it.
However, both Mr Ahern and Minister of State for Labour Tony Killeen have expressed doubts in the Dáil about the potential for Government action to stop the company.
In its recommendation yesterday on the dispute between the company and Siptu, the Labour Court said the conduct of "orderly industrial relations" required that parties honour agreements.
The company, it said, had not made out a "sufficiently compelling case" to justify unilateral termination of the agreement reached with unions in June last year on seafarers' pay and conditions.
Accordingly, it was recommending that the company honour the agreement of 2004 and that the parties resume negotiations on such modifications as were considered necessary.
In a second recommendation, the court found in favour of a Seamen's Union of Ireland claim that members who wished to remain at the company ought to retain their existing terms and conditions of employment.
The company also rejected this recommendation. It has offered its 543 seafarers on Irish Sea routes the option of redundancy or continued employment, but on reduced pay and conditions.
The Taoiseach said last night the Labour Court was "the proper arbiter" of good industrial relations practice. "I would hope that both parties would respect the decision of the court."
But in its statement rejecting the recommendations, Irish Ferries said its cost reduction programme was needed to address "unprecedented adverse trading conditions".
It said fuel costs were on course to double between 2004 and 2006, the car tourism market was in decline and its labour costs were substantially higher than those of its competitors.
"Indeed, given the fiduciary responsibilities which must be discharged by the board of the company under law, it is impossible to see how management can accept any course other than the cost reduction programme proposed by the company."
Shares in its parent company, Irish Continental Group, fell by 18 cent, or 1.7 per cent, to close at €10.47, after the Labour Court recommendations were delivered.
An application by the company to re-register its Irish Sea vessels to Cyprus, meanwhile, has been turned down by the Department of the Marine.
The Irish Times also reports that decoupling production from direct payments in the reformed Common Agricultural Policy will reduce the incentive to produce and presents a threat to the beef and grain sectors, the Irish Cooperative Organisation Society (ICOS) conference was told yesterday.
Michael Dowling, head of agri strategy in AIB, told ICOS delegates that because the payments being made to farmers were not index-linked, they were certain to reduce.
Outlining the benefits and deficits, Mr Dowling, a former secretary general of the Department of Agriculture, said the changes offered no threat to milk supply but added that beef production and cereal production in the new era would face threats.
He said that while all sectors faced tougher competition, sugar beet was most vulnerable.
Beef was also facing tougher competition because it was doing so in what he termed a deficit market.
Mr Dowling said the policy environment needed to be stabilised and scale was essential at farm, processing and marketing levels.
He also called for barriers to rational development of the market to be removed and in that context, the rigidity of the milk quota system to be examined.
The chairman of the Irish Dairy Board, Michael Cronin, predicted that there would be a fall in the prices dairy farmers received for their milk and they should plan for that.
However, Irish producer prices were still higher than those being received elsewhere in Europe and Irish farmers had major economic advantages in producing milk; he expected that many European farmers would give up their quota, he said.
In the long term, said Mr Cronin, there was the possibility of milk quota being traded across national boundaries and there was a possibility of Irish farmers being allowed to produce more milk than now.
However, there was going to be a dramatic fall in the number of Irish dairy farmers in the next four or five years with the present level of 24,000 possibly falling to half that.
Dairy farms would have to become larger and more efficient and he believed Irish farmers had the capacity to adapt more quickly than other European farmers.
Speakers at the annual conference had called for a fresh look at the control non-milk producer shareholders now have over co-operatives and indicated that the so called "dry shareholders" were beginning to outnumber the producers in dairy co-ops.
The director general of ICOS, the umbrella body for the co-op movement, said that the issue was being addressed in some co-operatives where voting power was based on the trading links the shareholder had with the cooperative.
The Irish Examiner reports that US pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson is pressing ahead with its €530 million investment in Little Island, Cork, despite an EU threat to block €50m in IDA grants committed to the project.
Its subsidiary Centocor is to produce a range of medical products at the plant for the treatment of a variety of diseases. The company originally announced plans for the project in July 2004.
EU competition officials have demanded extensive details of the plant and grant said from the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment.
The process has set the venture back about 12 months but it is gong ahead, a spokeswoman for the department said last night.
It is understood that any plans for further expansion will not go ahead if the investment aid is blocked by the EU Commission. It has expressed serious concerns the hefty €50m grant aid is anti-competitive.
In the course of its investigation it has demanded extensive back up material from the department and IDA Ireland on the nature of the commercial development planned by the giant pharmaceutical group.
It has yet to make a final decision, but an announcement is due within a month, it is understood.
Precedent for the blocking of grant aid to multinationals setting up here already exists.
That was set in March when the EU blocked a €170m aid package to Intel, the world’s largest computer chip manufacturer.
The funding was towards its new state-of-the-art €2.5 billion plant in Leixlip. Intel has massive investment in Ireland and the move by the commission raised fears of further restrictions down the line.
Another ruling against the IDA grant aid system could seriously damage this country’s ability to entice foreign direct investment into Ireland.
With competition intense across Europe and elsewhere for new investment the IDA is struggling to win new start-ups and the past few years has seen a fall in investment trends.
As a result of the uncertainty over the grant package the project has been delayed and will be 12 months behind schedule, but that was due to the commission’s demands.
It does not reflect any reluctance by the company to proceed, the department spokeswoman said.
She refused to comment however that this latest attempt by the commission to block funding of another inward investment project has been taken up at the highest level within Government.
At this point the department was dealing with Brussels on the matter and “we have not further comment to make at this time”, she said.
The Irish Examiner also reports that there was good news for publicans yesterday as official figures showed bar sales continued to bounce back after last year’s dip.
The Central Statistics Office (CSO) said pub sales in September were 5.1% ahead of the same month last year, when measured in value terms. It was the seventh month in a row that publicans’ revenues increased.
Goodbody Stockbrokers chief economist Dermot O’Leary said it augured well for the pub sector ahead of the key pre-Christmas trading season.
“Publicans had been losing custom to the off-licence trade in recent years, due in part to the uncompetitive pricing trends in the sector. However, the moderation in inflation, coupled with increased levels of discretionary spending, is helping to entice consumers back to the pubs.”
Overall consumer spending continued to surge during September.
Total retail sales during the month were 7.2% ahead of last year in value terms and 5% higher in volume terms, excluding the effect of price hikes.
Mr O’Leary said consumer spending was driving the economy and the growth in retail sales in the three months to September had been “impressive.”
Department stores saw sales up 10% in the quarter ended September, was far ahead of the sluggish 1% growth figure at the start of the summer. Sales of clothing and footwear were also 10% ahead.
Mr O’Leary said consumers were dealing with the shock of higher energy prices “reasonably well.”
He also predicted a strong consumer spending performance over the next two years, thanks to the injection of fresh momentum from this year’s Budget package and the release of funds from the Special Savings Incentive Account (SSIA) scheme, which will start to unwind in April.
The Financial Times reports that Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, on Monday promoted Dmitry Medvedev, his powerful chief of staff, to a top government position in a move observers said initiates the succession process for the presidency.
In a rare government reshuffle, Mr Medvedev, who is also the chairman of Gazprom, the country's most powerful energy company, was appointed first deputy prime minister.
Sergei Ivanov, the defence minister and Mr Putin's confidant since the time when both men served as KGB spies, will assume the additional role of deputy prime minister.
Analysts said the moves mark out Mr Medvedev as the Kremlin's favourite to succeed Mr Putin as president in 2008, with Mr Ivanov as a reserve candidate.
“The project called ‘the successor' has begun,” said Lilia Shevtsova, analyst at the Carnegie Moscow Center. “Putin has clearly shown he will not stay as president after 2008.”
Nikita Belykh, the leader of the liberal Union of Right Forces, said: “Vladimir Putin has marked out his possible successors for the future presidential elections.”
“This decision effectively means the start of the presidential campaign of 2008 and it is clear the successor is going to be Dmitry Medvedev,” said Dmitry Rogozin, the leader of the nationalist Rodina [Motherland] party.
Both Mr Medvedev and Mr Ivanov are close allies of Mr Putin from his native city of St Petersburg. Mr Medvedev, a 40-year-old former lawyer, has been close to Mr Putin since both men worked in the city's administration during the early 1990s.
Last month Mr Putin put Mr Medvedev in charge of the Council for National Projects a body which will oversee billions of dollars of spending on social and infrastructure projects.
Being in charge of national projects will allow Mr Medvedev to be associated with increasing spending on health and education, thus improving his chances as a presidential candidate.
The FT also reports that Microsoft will on Tuesday reveal plans to cash in on the second version of its Xbox games console, with the help of an online marketplace where users can download games and music videos.
The software group's Home and Entertainment division, which lost nearly $4bn (Ł2.3bn) in four years of developing and marketing the original console, is hoping Xbox Live Marketplace sales where users will be able to choose from up to 400 items will help move the division into the black.
Microsoft earns revenues from sales of the Xbox console and the games its studios produce as well as royalties from other games publishers that use the platform. The Xbox Live service, where more than 2m members worldwide play each other over the internet, also brings in subscription revenues.
Microsoft users will be able to download complete games from November 22, the day of the launch, although these will be relatively unsophisticated titles such as Bejeweled and Zuma as well as backgammon and card games. The online store could be used to provide full console games but the leading publishers are not ready for such a step and Microsoft would risk alienating retailers. Aaron Greenberg, marketing manager for Xbox Live, said: "Our arcade will deal with smaller games; we are not disrupting the retail channel. "That's the focus right now, we have a great relationship with our retail ecosystem."
The online market will offer free interactive demonstrations of popular games such as the latest Electronic Arts' Fifa soccer title and a King Kong game based on the new film.
There will also be new music videos from rock bands Franz Ferdinand and Audioslave.
The Xbox 360 will in effect open another channel through which Microsoft can sell and deliver digital entertainment for the home. The console contains a Media Center extender technology that allows video and music to be played from computers running Windows Media Center software on a remote television using a wireless connection to the 360.
The company is also launching Microsoft Points in a bid to overcome the fact that many people do not have credit cards. Consumers will be able to buy a card worth 1,600 points for $19.99 at shops in the US and then use the points to buy items such as a scenario for the Amped 3 snowboarding game costing 150 points or a gamer picture for 20 points.
Downloading an arcade game such as Bejeweled 2 costs 800 points, or about $10.
The services and cards will be available for the North American 360 launch next week and international versions should be ready when Microsoft launches the console in Europe on December 2 and Japan on December 10.
The New York Times asks: Has the American voter's ardor for cutting taxes and shrinking government cooled?
Voters in California, Colorado and Washington State rejected ballot measures this month that would have rolled back tax increases or limited state spending. Some say the votes could mark a turning point in a decades-old revolt against high taxes that got its symbolic start in California in 1978 with Proposition 13, which sharply limited property tax increases for homeowners and cut deeply into state services.
It may be, some analysts suggested, that after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and this year's Gulf Coast hurricanes, Americans saw the value of government investment in infrastructure, public safety and other services and are now more willing to pay for it.
"It looks like that to me," said John G. Matsusaka, president of the Initiative and Referendum Institute at the University of Southern California Law School. "The public sector did a lot of belt-tightening during the last recession, and the public now appears to be letting it out a few notches. I think we saw that in Washington State and Colorado."
On Nov. 1, Colorado voters approved a ballot proposition that would allow the state to keep a projected $3.7 billion in tax revenue over the next five years rather than return it to taxpayers.
In California last Tuesday, voters resoundingly defeated Proposition 76, supported by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. The measure would have limited state spending and given the governor broad new powers to cut spending when state revenue lagged.
And in Washington, an initiative put on the ballot by antitax groups failed last week by a six-point margin, letting stand a 9.5-cents-a-gallon gasoline tax passed by the Legislature.
In California, Mr. Matsusaka said, voters ignored Mr. Schwarzenegger's appeals to give him more power to cut state spending and tuned out television advertisements warning that the rejection of Proposition 76 would mean a big tax increase next year.
In New Jersey, which has the highest property taxes per person in the nation, voters elected Senator Jon S. Corzine, a Democrat, as governor last week, even though he promised a more modest reduction in property taxes than his Republican opponent, Douglas R. Forrester.
"People are still concerned about spending, but it's not a front-burner issue for them," Mr. Matsusaka said. "They're more concerned about wanting to put money in for education."
Advocates of cutting taxes and limiting public spending said, however, that the three ballot results were responses to specific situations and did not mark the beginning of some sort of backlash.
"I don't see it," said Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform and one of the nation's most vocal tax opponents. "I would be very sensitive to it and sweating over it if it were happening."
California voters, Mr. Norquist said, were in a sour mood over the special election last week when they voted down the spending cap and all seven other measures on the ballot. Washington voters succumbed to warnings that roads and bridges were crumbling and that the gas tax was needed to avert disaster.
And, he said, Colorado voters were hoodwinked by a "traitor" Republican governor, Bill Owens, into voting for a huge tax increase. (Governor Owens's argument was that limits had locked spending at levels that were far too low to handle the state's increasing population and cost of services.)
"All trends start with small sets of data points," Mr. Norquist said when asked if the three votes could mark a major shift in public opinion. "But if you flesh in the picture for the year, that's not the case at all."
Mr. Norquist pointed to a proposal in Oklahoma in September that would raise gasoline taxes to pay for highway construction and maintenance. It was defeated by 87 percent to 13 percent. He said that while Colorado residents voted to lift the spending cap, they also turned down a $2.1 billion bond issue for transportation. Voters in West Virginia also rejected a big bond issue to underwrite the state's pension funds.
Mr. Norquist said he was working with tax-limitation groups in Maine, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma and Oregon to put spending limits before voters in 2006. He said lawmakers in several other states were also considering new caps on state spending, using a variety of formulas involving population growth and inflation.
Kim Rueben, a public finance economist at the Tax Policy Center at the Urban Institute, said the outcome of the votes this year was not sufficient to establish a trend. But Ms. Rueben said that for the past several years voters had been willing to increase taxes or approve bond issues when they were designated for tangible improvements.
On Tuesday, voters in Maine, New York and Ohio approved bond issues totaling nearly $5 billion to pay for transportation projects, water systems, college buildings and research programs.
"Starting in the late 1990's, there has been more emphasis on the state of state infrastructure, and effort to get new money in and new things built," Ms. Rueben said. "I think in general people want roads and are happy to fund them. But they are less willing to just turn over money to the state and let officials decide how to spend it."
That was how Gov. Christine Gregoire of Washington, a Democrat, went about trying to save the gasoline tax increase that barely passed the Legislature on the last day of the session in May.
After the tax bill squeaked through, opponents quickly gathered 400,000 signatures to put a measure on the Nov. 8 ballot to repeal the increase, which will take effect in increments over the next three years. The money is dedicated to the repairing and seismic retrofitting of the state's highways, bridges and tunnels.
Governor Gregoire said in an interview that two rockslides that closed the Interstate 90 pass through the mountains of eastern Washington and the damage along the Gulf Coast from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita helped her cause, by showing what can happen when state infrastructure is in poor condition.
"Their levees are our bridges," Ms. Gregoire said, referring to New Orleans. "People here were skeptical, but Katrina brought the message home loud and clear."
She added, "People here who have been antitax for a number of years now said: 'We're not going to leave our safety at risk; we're not going to leave this to our kids. We're going to invest.' "
The repeal measure was voted down by 53 percent to 47 percent, but a look at a map of how Washington residents voted is revealing.
Twenty-nine of Washington's 39 counties voted to repeal, many of them by margins of 20 or even 30 percentage points. The measure failed because the heavily populated, more liberal counties around Seattle and two college towns in eastern Washington voted against it.
In other words, when it comes to taxes, Americans are still divided.
The NYT also reports that a few years ago, Russia's finance officials could only dream of the problem Aleksei L. Kudrin described recently.
Thanks to bountiful revenue from oil exports, the Kremlin is in a position to pay $15 billion in sovereign debt ahead of schedule next year.
"We would be ready to pay the whole sum," Mr. Kudrin, Russia's finance minister, explained recently to a group of investors. Other countries, however, are not permitting Russia to accelerate repayment because of other obligations tied to the debt.
Mr. Kudrin's comments illustrate an economic challenge - and a fierce internal debate - novel for Russia, which only seven years ago defaulted on its debt.
As the world's second-largest oil exporter, behind only Saudi Arabia, Russia is taking in $500 million a day from crude oil exports and the cash is gushing faster than the nation can absorb it without causing inflation.
Russia is still a relatively poor developing country, and with obvious needs to fix decades of accumulated infrastructure problems and pull an estimated 25 million Russians out of poverty, it has no dearth of things to spend money on.
If it does not manage smartly, however, Russia's embarrassment of new riches can turn into a classic paradox of good times, one that economists call the Dutch disease, afflicting energy-exporting countries.
The government is pulled in many directions.
"My pension is tiny," said Lina S. Martinyenko, 76, a widow selling plastic bags of pickled cabbage on a Moscow sidewalk to supplement her pension of $98 a month. "I have to pay for my apartment. Groceries are expensive. What I grow in my garden I haul out here to sell. Life is not simple for us."
The challenge with Dutch disease - the name for what happened in the Netherlands after the discovery of North Sea gas in the 1960's - is that as more and more oil dollars come back to Russia, they are converted to the local currency, raising the value of that currency, along with the threat of inflation.
For Russia, the threat is that its manufacturing will decline as its goods become more expensive overseas, while imports rise as they become cheaper at home, leading to a de-industrialization of the economy. The problem is exactly the reverse of Russia's chronic economic troubles with a weak ruble in the 1990's.
"It always goes badly for Russia," Irina E. Yasina, director of the Open Russia research institute, fretted. "It's bad when we don't have money and bad when we do."
Still, Russia is better off with its current problem than it was a few years ago.
Some of the impact is already surfacing, as Russia is starting to rearm itself. For the first time in a decade, the government is buying more of Russia's arms production for the country's own needs rather than to resell as exports.
Spending on military hardware will rise 50 percent next year, Gen. Yuri N. Baluyevsky, the chief of the general staff, told the government newspaper Rossiskaya Gazeta in an interview published recently. The 2006 budget includes money for everything from new Sukhoi fighter jets to such prestige-enhancing items as lambskin hats for Russia's generals, an accoutrement abandoned by Boris N. Yeltsin when he was president in leaner times, in 1993.
On Nov. 1, Russia's Stabilization Fund reached $38 billion. It is projected to exceed $50 billion by the end of the year. Under the law that created it, the fund can be used only to pay down foreign debt or top off the state pension fund.
The World Bank, in a report released this month, said the appreciation of the ruble had already harmed domestic production. "Many industries are struggling," the report said. The ruble appreciated by 7.3 percent against a basket of currencies in the first nine months of this year, the bank said.
Russia missed its 10 percent inflation target last year, registering growth in prices of 11.7 percent. This year, inflation is running about 11 percent, according to Andrei N. Illarionov, President Vladimir V. Putin's economic adviser. High inflation threatens domestic industry and undermines gains in living standards.
Beginning in 2004, fears of inflation led Mr. Illarionov and other liberals in Russia's government to isolate oil revenue in the Stabilization Fund, modeled on a similar fund in Norway and the Alaska Permanent Fund. The money is kept out of circulation. For a time, that settled the question of what to do with the billions of dollars.
But Russia now intends to begin spending from its specialized oil revenue accounts through the creation of a second fund. The proposed new fund would invest in infrastructure through loan guarantees or co-financing backed by the oil tax income.
Even with inflationary constraints brought by the ruble's floating on international markets, the Kremlin is financially stronger than at any time since a similar spike in oil prices in the early 1980's.
Back then, the Soviet Union threw oil revenue into the final sprint of the cold war arms race, largely ignoring the rest of the economy, and plunging into the reforms begun by Premier Mikhail S. Gorbachev only after the prices came back down.
This time, Mr. Putin has suggested completing the Boguchansk hydroelectric dam in eastern Siberia, which was begun in Soviet times but was abandoned half finished. Russian news media floated the idea of finally completing the Baikal-Amur railway, another epic Soviet-era undertaking left unfinished.
Viktor B. Khristenko, the minister of energy and industry, is pushing a plan to use the new investment fund, expected to reach about $2.4 billion next year, to revive production of the Ruslan cargo jet, a Russian aviation behemoth able to carry 150 tons, the largest such jet in the world.
The government Web site posted a strategy paper on "measures intended to speed up growth and improve the competitiveness of the economy." It encouraged the creation of a government-owned venture capital fund for high- tech companies.
For now, the money from oil-related taxes - which kick in at oil prices above $20 a barrel - has simply been stacking up in an account in the Ministry of Finance. The money has not been invested in stocks or bonds and yields no interest, although it has appreciated along with the ruble's oil-driven rise in value against the dollar.
In a change of policy, the Finance Ministry said last month that it would invest the funds in foreign bonds and currency under a plan developed by Russia's Central Bank, another institution brimming with petroleum cash these days. The bank's foreign currency and gold reserves reached $164 billion on Oct. 28. Mr. Kudrin, whose ministry wants to tame inflation and use the funds mainly to pay down sovereign debt, has his detractors. Just about everybody else in government wants to start spending, either on infrastructure, social needs or re-arming the military, an option favored by a hard-line faction in the Kremlin.
Mr. Putin is moving cautiously. He recently urged restraint in spending, even as Russia faces many problems, and suggested continued commitment to the Stabilization Fund and large foreign debt payments even as domestic spending rises. Mr. Putin's political image is that of the guardian of stability; roller coaster exchange rates or inflation set off by mishandling money from the oil boom would hurt him politically.
Russia could "take advantage of the foreign economic situation which today favors our country and become mired in long-term projects," he said. But "in case the situation changes we would again have to incur debts in order to complete the projects started or cut spending sharply."
But then again, Mr. Putin also knows how to spend. At a Kremlin meeting with lawmakers in September, he also promised an additional $4 billion to raise doctors' salaries and other social spending next year.
© Copyright 2007 by Finfacts.com