|
|
EU tax levels remain generally high in comparison with the rest of the world; the EU25 tax ratio exceeds those of the USA and of Japan by some 14 percentage points. However, the tax burden varies significantly between Member States, ranging in 2004 from 28.4% in Lithuania and 28.6% in Latvia to 50.5% in Sweden and 48.8% in Denmark. Generally, the new Member States tend to have lower tax ratios; however Ireland (30.2%), Portugal (34.5%) and Spain (34.6%) also display notably low overall tax ratios. In the past decade significant changes in tax ratios have taken place in several Member States. The largest falls have been for Slovakia, where the overall tax burden dropped from 40.5% in 1995 to 30.3% in 2004, Poland (from 38.5% to 32.9%) and Estonia (from 37.9% to 32.6%). The highest increases were noted for Malta (from 27.6% to 35.1%) and Cyprus (from 26.9% to 34.1%). Overall, given also that in many Member States tax ratios have shown little change, EU25 tax levels are nearly the same as they were in 1995 (39.7%); nevertheless, the ratio has shown a non-negligible decrease from a peak of 41.2% in 1999. This information comes from the publication ‘Structures of the taxation systems in the European Union: 1995-2004’3 issued by Eurostat, the Statistical Office of the European Communities and the Commission’s Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union. This publication compiles tax indicators in a harmonised framework based on the European System of Accounts (ESA 95), allowing accurate comparison of the tax systems and tax policies between EU Member States. Implicit tax ratios indicate shifts in the tax burden falling on labour and consumption For the EU25 as a whole, the average implicit tax rate (ITR) on labour4, the preferred indicator for the average tax burden, amounted to 35.9% in 2004. On average, ITRs on labour saw little change from the year before, despite a wide consensus on the desirability of reducing labour taxes. The EU25 average is likewise nearly unchanged from its 1995 level (35.7%) although a slight decrease was recorded from its maximum of 36.2% in 2000. Among the Member States, in 2004 this rate ranged from 23.1% in Cyprus, 23.9% in Malta and 24.8% in the United Kingdom to 45.9% in Sweden, 43.0% in Belgium and 42.4% in France. Despite lower overall tax ratios, the new Member States on average show a roughly similar ITR on labour as the EU25.
In contrast to the nearly stable ITR on labour, the average implicit tax rate on consumption4 in the EU25 has been on the increase; it rose from 20.8% in 2001 to 21.9% in 2004. The 2004 increase is the third in a row. Consumption was most taxed in Denmark (33.3%), Hungary (28.6%) and Finland (27.9%). At the other end, Spain (16.0%), Italy (16.8%) and Malta (17.0%) registered the lowest implicit rates. The average implicit tax rate on capital4 in the EU25 increased steadily from 23.1% in 1995 to 27.7% in 2000, then fell to 25.8% by 2003 (2004 data are missing for several Member States). There is considerable disparity in this ratio: among the Member States, the highest implicit tax rates on capital were recorded in Denmark (43.8% in 2004), France (36.9% in 2004), the United Kingdom (34.9% in 2004) and Belgium (34.8% in 2004) and the lowest in Lithuania (6.8% in 2003), Latvia (9.3% in 2003) and Estonia (10.3% in 2003). Labour taxes remain the largest source of tax revenue, representing around half of total tax receipts in the EU25. Taxes on capital accounted for approximately 22% of total tax receipts, and consumption taxes 28%. Tax revenue and implicit tax rates by type of economic activity
Source: European Commission Services. * EU25 and euro-zone overall tax ratios are computed on the basis of a GDP-weighted average. For all other indicators the aggregates are calculated as arithmetic averages of the Member States for which the respective annual data are available. Slovakia excluded from the averages for the implicit tax rates. : data not available Top rates on average lower in new Member States In 2006 the highest top statutory personal income tax rates5 are found in Denmark (59.0%), Sweden (56.6%), the Netherlands (52.0%) and Finland (51.0%), and the lowest in Slovakia (19.0%), Estonia (23.0%), Latvia (25.0%) and Cyprus (30.0%). As for the corporate income tax6, the highest adjusted top statutory tax rates are recorded in Germany (38.6%), Italy (37.3%), Spain and Malta (both 35.0%), and the lowest in Cyprus (10.0%), Ireland (12.5%), Latvia and Lithuania (both 15.0%).
Over recent years top rates have shown a clear downward trend in the whole of the EU, particularly in the corporate area but also in the realm of personal taxation. On average, the new Member States display markedly lower top rates. Top statutory personal income tax rate in 2006, %
Source: European Commission Services. * Arithmetic average. Adjusted top statutory tax rate on corporate income in 2006, %
Source: European Commission Services. * Arithmetic average. Share of environmental taxes in total taxation falling overall, but increasing in several new Member States In the last years, reliance on environmental taxes has been weakening in the EU25, as the share of revenue accounted by them has been decreasing; on the other hand, clear increases have been recorded in the majority of the 10 new Member States. Cyprus (11.9%) had the highest proportion of environmental taxes on the total in 2004, followed by the Netherlands (10.3%) and Denmark (9.8%). The lowest proportion was found in France (4.9%), Belgium (5.3%) and Sweden (5.7%). Energy taxes represented by far the largest component of environmental taxes, accounting for three quarters of the total. Environmental taxes as % of total tax revenue
Source: European Commission Services. * GDP-weighted average. : data not available
Compared to the figures on overall tax burden published in the last edition of Structures of the taxation systems in the European Union, (see News Release 134/2005 of 21 October 2005) data have been revised.
ITR on labour considers all personal income taxes, payroll taxes and compulsory social security contributions as labour tax revenues and, as the tax base, the total amount of compensation of employees in the economy. The average may conceal important variations in the tax burden across the income distribution. ITR on consumption considers taxes levied on transactions between (final) consumers and producers and on the (final) consumption of goods. The tax base is defined as the final consumption expenditure of households on the economic territory. ITR on capital includes taxes levied on the income earned from savings and investments by households and corporations and taxes related to stocks of capital stemming from savings and investment in previous periods. The denominator of the capital ITR aims to approximate the world-wide capital and business income of Member States' residents for domestic tax purposes. Trends in this capital ITR reflect a wide range of factors and it should be interpreted with caution. All ITRs for the EU25 and the euro area are calculated as arithmetic averages.
© Copyright 2007 by Finfacts.com | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||