|
|
Fortunately, they have occurred at a time when growth was being supported by high employment that boosts income and consumption; by high profits and strong balance sheets that underpin investment and resilience in the face of financial losses and tighter credit; and by still buoyant world trade driven by robust growth in emerging economies. Hence, although near-term growth has been revised down virtually everywhere in the OECD area, the baseline scenario depicted in its latest Economic Outlook is actually not that bad in view of the recent shocks. It represents the outcome that carries the highest probability in the current more uncertain situation and involves:
However, the OECD said that the trouble is that the probability distribution around this outcome has a fat tail on the downside. The main negative risks include a more pronounced or generalised cooling of housing markets than projected; additional turbulence in financial markets; and further upward pressures on already high commodity prices. Against this backdrop, economic policy should prepare for the contingencies that could arise. There are several policy areas where appropriate policy settings can help to deal with any such risks. Well-anchored inflation expectations have allowed a number of central banks to respond flexibly to the financial turmoil, through provision of liquidity to interbank markets as well as through lower interest rates than markets had previously expected. Expectations of low inflation also help the adjustment to higher oil and commodity prices and allows for a monetary policy response to cooling housing markets where necessary. Overall, the confidence that inflation will remain low, built up through a long and sometimes painful process of disinflation, constitutes a major policy asset. Jørgen Elmeskov, Acting Head of Economics Department said, however, the continued anchoring of inflation expectations cannot be taken for granted. Indeed, margins of slack throughout much of the OECD have shrunk and are now small or non-existent -- even if their exact size is admittedly uncertain. Moreover, OECD economies are being hit by cost shocks: raw material prices have soared and, partly in connection therewith, the disinflationary effects of manufactured imports from China are fading. If signs were to emerge that inflation expectations are drifting up, it might be necessary to pay a price in terms of lower activity in the short term to preserve this vital policy asset. The OECD said countries have been, and will be, hit differently by financial turmoil and housing-related weakness. In such circumstances, the natural response of market economies includes a re-pricing of currencies. As long as such movements do not become a source of instability, they tend to facilitate the necessary adjustment process by redirecting demand to where it has fallen. Recent dollar depreciation is a case in point. The projections rest on the assumption of unchanged exchange rates but were downside risks to manifest themselves to different degrees across countries, this could well be accompanied by exchange rate adjustment. This could lead to concern for activity in countries facing appreciation and for inflation in countries witnessing depreciation. However, such pressures should not be an excuse for interventionist policies since they can usually be compensated to a large extent through monetary policy. In the current circumstances, a striking feature as regards exchange rates is the so far limited appreciation of the renminbi. Given symptoms of overheating and high domestic inflation, faster appreciation would seem to be in China’s own interest. It would also allow less emphasis to be put on direct intervention and regulatory instruments to contain inflation, with beneficial effects for the economy going forward. At the same time, it would help shift demand towards other countries where downside risks are currently larger. The OECD forecasts that Eurozone growth will fall from 2.6% this year to 1.9% in 2008. In the United States, real activity growth is expected to fall sharply in the first quarter of 2008 before slowly resuming an upward trend. For 2008 as a whole, economic growth in the US is forecast at 2%. UK growth is also forecast to fall next year, declining from 3.1% in 2007 to a projected 2% in 2008. The OECD said that t he Irish economic slowdown may be short with a rebound forecast in 2009. It forecast that Irish economic growth will improve from 3% in 2008 to 4.5% in 2009 as housing construction stabilises.The Economic Outlook anticipates that the plunge in housebuilding will cause the growth in real Gross National Product (GNP) to fall to 3% in 2008 "but to recover to grow at 4.5% in 2009 as housing construction levels out at a sustainable level". The OECD warns that the growth in public spending needs to be limited and that "sharp pay increases in the public sector need to be avoided". *The Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), the Paris-based economics think tank for governments of 30 countries: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States. © Copyright 2007 by Finfacts.com |