 |
|
The twin spires of
the Grossmünster are a distinctive feature of Zurich’s
cityscape: the popular panoramic view shows Zurich with Lake
Zurich and the snow-capped Alps in the background. © Zurich
Tourism/Manuel Bauer |
-
European cities dominate annual worldwide quality of living rankings
-
Zurich scores highest for overall quality of living; Baghdad, the
lowest
-
Luxembourg ranks highest for personal safety; Baghdad, the lowest
-
In
UK, Glasgow (43) and Birmingham (53) rank safer than London (69)
Quality of Living 2007 Report - with
full city tables
European
cities dominate the worldwide rankings of locations with the best
quality of living, according to Mercer's
2008 Quality of Living Survey. Zurich retains its 2007 title
as the highest ranked city, followed jointly by Vienna (2), Geneva (2),
then Vancouver (4) and Auckland (5). Dublin has a worldwide rank of 25
and 8th place among European cities.
In the UK, London ranks 38, while Birmingham and Glasgow
are jointly 56. The highest entry for the United States is Honolulu,
appearing at number 28. The cities with the lowest quality of living
ranking are Ndjamena (211), Khartoum (212), Brazzaville (213) and Bangui
(214). Baghdad, ranking 215, retains its position at the bottom of the
table.
The rankings are based on a point
scoring index, which sees Zurich scoring 108, while Baghdad scores 13.5.
Cities are compared to New York as the base city, with an index score of
100. The quality of living survey covers 215 cities and is conducted to
help governments and major companies place employees on international
assignments.
The survey also identifies those cities with the highest personal safety
ranking based on internal stability, crime, effectiveness of law
enforcement and relationships with other countries. Luxembourg is top,
followed by Bern, Geneva, Helsinki and Zurich, all equally placed at
number 2. Chicago, Houston and San Francisco are amongst the safest
cities in the US, all ranking at 53. Baghdad (215) is the world's least
safe city along with Kinshasa (214), Karachi (213), Nairobi (212) and
Bangui (211). Luxembourg scores 131.4 on the index while Baghdad scores
3.8.
According to Slagin Parakatil, senior
researcher at Mercer, "Businesses
face constant challenges in identifying new markets, expanding
operations and acquiring and strategically deploying resources.
Establishing suitable allowances linked to local costs and quality of
living is essential in encouraging expatriate employees with
transferable skills to accept international assignments."
He added:
"Personal and family safety is of paramount importance when employees
consider opportunities overseas. Cities that are, or are perceived as,
unsafe may experience difficulties in attracting the best people and
skills."
Americas
Canadian cities dominate the rankings in the Americas. Vancouver (4) has
the best quality of living followed by Toronto (15), Ottawa (19) and
Montreal (22). In the US, after Honolulu (28) comes San Francisco (29),
Boston (37) and Chicago (44). Washington, DC, ranks 44, above New York
(49).
In Central and South America, San Juan in Puerto Rico retains the
highest ranking at 72, followed by Montevideo at 76. Port au Prince in
Haiti ranks lowest in the region at 202. In terms of the index,
Vancouver scores 107.6 compared to Port au Prince's 39.8.
In terms of personal safety, Canadian cities again perform best with
Calgary, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto and Vancouver all ranked jointly at
22. In the US, Chicago, Honolulu, Houston, Lexington, San Francisco and
Winston-Salem all share rank 53. Elsewhere in the region, Santo Domingo
has the highest ranking at 92 followed by Panama City (96) and Monterrey
(99). Bogota (207) in Colombia has the lowest levels of personal safety.
The Canadian cities score 115.8 compared to Bogota's 30.4.
Parakatil said, "Personal safety within Canadian
cities ranks among the highest in the region. This is due to a
relatively low crime rate and a stable political environment. In
contrast, many of the Latin American cities such as Caracas, Bogotá or
Port au Prince continue to be undermined by crime and political and
economic turmoil. Traffic congestion and pollution have also had an
impact."
Europe
Switzerland and Germany dominate the European cities with the best
quality of living, each having three cities represented in the top 10.
Bern, in Switzerland, ranks 9 following behind Zurich and Geneva.
Dusseldorf (6), Munich and Frankfurt (both at 7) represent Germany.
Outside the top 10 are Copenhagen (11), Amsterdam (13), Brussels (14),
Berlin (16) and Luxembourg (17). Dublin, ranking 25, is followed by
Paris (32), Barcelona (42) and Madrid (43). Lisbon is number 44 and is
followed by Rome, 55, up from 61 in 2007. Prague (71) is the
highest-ranking eastern European city followed by Budapest (74), Vilnius
(78), Ljubljana (82) and Warsaw (85). The lowest ranking European city
is Minsk (183) in Belarus. Minsk scores 49.4 on the index compared with
Zurich's 108. Milan (41), Lisbon (44), Vilnius (78) and Riga (89) have
also become more attractive destinations, rising markedly in the
rankings since 2007.
The rankings of Bern, Geneva and Zurich, all at 2, confirm Switzerland's
position as one of the safest countries in Europe. According to the
index, Luxembourg, the European city with the highest level of personal
safety, scores 131.4. This is in stark contrast with Moscow, the
European city scoring the lowest at 37.7 (196). In the UK, Glasgow (43)
and Birmingham (53) rank safer than London (69)
Parakatil commented, "Europe dominates the list in terms of
infrastructure, health and political stability. Large discrepancies
continue to exist within this region. Living standards in Eastern
European cities have been catching up with Western European cities."
Worldwide Quality of Living Survey 2008
Top 10 & Bottom 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base City: New York, USA (=100) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank 2008 |
Rank 2007 |
City |
Country |
Index 2008 |
Index 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
ZURICH |
Switzerland |
108 |
108.1 |
|
2 |
3 |
VIENNA |
Austria |
107.9 |
107.7 |
|
2 |
2 |
GENEVA |
Switzerland |
107.9 |
108.0 |
|
4 |
3 |
VANCOUVER |
Canada |
107.6 |
107.7 |
|
5 |
5 |
AUCKLAND |
New Zealand |
107.3 |
107.3 |
|
6 |
5 |
DUSSELDORF |
Germany |
107.2 |
107.3 |
|
7 |
8 |
MUNICH |
Germany |
107 |
106.9 |
|
7 |
7 |
FRANKFURT |
Germany |
107 |
107.1 |
|
9 |
9 |
BERN |
Switzerland |
106.5 |
106.5 |
|
10 |
9 |
SYDNEY |
Australia |
106.3 |
106.5 |
|
206 |
203 |
DHAKA |
Bangladesh |
38.9 |
40.5 |
|
207 |
208 |
SANAA |
Yemen Arab Republic |
38.2 |
38.2 |
|
207 |
208 |
PORT HARCOURT |
Nigeria |
38.2 |
38.2 |
|
209 |
207 |
KINSHASA |
Dem. Rep. Of The Congo |
36.3 |
38.3 |
|
210 |
211 |
POINTE NOIRE |
Congo |
33 |
33.0 |
|
211 |
210 |
NDJAMENA |
Chad |
32.9 |
34.0 |
|
212 |
212 |
KHARTOUM |
Sudan |
31 |
31.0 |
|
213 |
214 |
BRAZZAVILLE |
Congo |
29.5 |
29.5 |
|
214 |
213 |
BANGUI |
Central African Republic |
29.3 |
30.6 |
|
215 |
215 |
BAGHDAD |
Iraq |
13.5 |
14.5 |
Middle East and Africa
Cape Town (80) in South Africa and Port Louis in Mauritius are the
region's cities with the best quality of living followed by Dubai (83)
and Abu Dhabi (87). In contrast, Johannesburg slips from 90 in 2007 to
94 in 2008 and Harare in Zimbabwe slips from 168 in 2007 to 174. Out of
the 25 lowest ranking cities, 19 are from Africa including Lagos (198),
Port Harcourt (207) and Bangui (214). Two are from the Middle East
including Sanaa (207) and Baghdad (215) - the city with the world's
lowest quality of living and lowest levels of personal safety. Cape Town
scores 87.9 compared to Baghdad's 13.5.
For personal safety, apart from Baghdad, Kinshasa is the worst location,
ranked 214, and Nairobi (212). Lagos and Port Harcourt rank equally at
209. Jerusalem and Beirut both rank 199 and Harare, 184. Abu Dhabi (33)
is the region's best city for personal safety, followed by Dubai (47),
Port Louis (60). Lusaka and Manama rank equally at (118). According to
the personal safety index, Abu Dhabi scores 112 against Baghdad's 3.8.
According to Parakatil, "Several regions of the Middle East have
benefited enormously from government investment in infrastructure,
health and sanitation and are rising up the rankings. However, personal
safety and political tensions remain stumbling blocks and account for
the low ranking of many of the region's cities. Multinationals often
compensate for this by increasing compensation levels and other benefits
for their employees."
Asia Pacific
Auckland (5) is the city in Asia Pacific with the best quality of
living, followed by Sydney (10) and Wellington (12). Elsewhere in Asia,
Singapore (32) ranks two places higher than in 2007, slightly higher
than Japanese cities such as Tokyo (35). Hong Kong and Beijing retain
their 2007 rankings, respectively 70 and 116 in 2008. Bangalore (140) is
India's most highly ranked city followed closely by Mumbai (142). Both
have seen a marked improvement in their rankings since 2007. Elsewhere
in Asia, Kuala Lumpur ranks 75, followed by Taipei (84), Seoul (86),
Bangkok (109) and Jakarta (146). According to the index, Auckland, the
city with the best quality of living in Asia Pacific, scores 107.3 while
Dhaka, the city with the region's worst quality of living, scores 38.9.
For personal safety, Pakistan is one of the lowest-scoring destinations
with Karachi, Islamabad and Lahore ranked 213, 203 and 192 respectively.
Colombo in Sri Lanka appears at 204 while Dhaka (201), Jakarta (189) and
Manila (178) are amongst the region's cities scoring lowest on personal
safety. Singapore is the region's best location for personal safety,
scoring 120.2 compared to Karachi's 25.3.
"Increased political stability and the growth of China and India have
led to a broad improvement in the quality of living for expatriates in
some of the major cities," commented Parakatil. "However, border
conflicts and internal issues, combined with high levels of crime, make
many other countries like Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Indonesia less
appealing relocation destinations."
Data was largely collected between September and November 2007 and is
regularly updated to take account of changing circumstances. In
particular, the assessments will be revised in the case of any new
developments. The Mercer database contains more than 350 cities, however
only 215 cities have been considered for the quality of living 2008
ranking in order to compare from one year to the next.
The worldwide rankings are produced from the most recent Worldwide
Quality of Living Survey, conducted by Mercer. Individual reports are
produced for each city surveyed, but please note that there is no
overall summary report available. The cost of comparative quality of
living indexes between a base city and a host city is €300 (multiple
city comparisons are available).
Further information, visit
www.imercer.com/qolpr
| |
|
Mercer's study is based on detailed assessments and
evaluations of 39 key quality of living determinants,
grouped in the following categories:
-
Political and social environment (political stability,
crime, law enforcement, etc)
-
Economic environment (currency exchange regulations,
banking services, etc)
-
Socio-cultural environment (censorship, limitations on
personal freedom, etc)
-
Health and sanitation (medical supplies and services,
infectious diseases, sewage, waste disposal, air
pollution, etc)
-
Schools and education (standard and availability of
international schools, etc)
-
Public services and transportation (electricity, water,
public transport, traffic congestion, etc)
-
Recreation (restaurants, theatres, cinemas, sports and
leisure, etc)
-
Consumer goods (availability of food/daily consumption
items, cars, etc)
-
Housing (housing, household appliances, furniture,
maintenance services, etc)
-
Natural environment (climate, record of natural
disasters)
However, at
an individual level, an expat may well have a better quality
of life in say Kuala Lumpur at 75 than Dublin at 25. For the
same rent, an apartment in the high-income area in KL would
be three times the size of one in Dublin and have access to
swimming pool, gym etc on site. Besides, the cost of living,
is much lower.
The
orientation of the survey appears to be from a US/European
perspective. Cold European winters would not be everyone's
cup of tea! |
|